Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 5600GT outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 5 5600GT is 4144 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 53% cheaper than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $59.4 vs $127.52
- Up to 49% better value when playing Deathloop than Ryzen 5 5600GT - $0.35 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT
- Performs up to 11% better in Deathloop than Core i3-3220T - 187 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 12 vs 4 threads
Deathloop
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
168
89.83957219251337%
Value, $/FPS
$0.35/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
187
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
51.470588235294116%
Price, $
$127.52
46%
FPS Winner
Buy for $127.52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 228 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
22.37420615534929%
Multi-Core
941
11.397771317829458%
Intel Core i3-3220T | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 5600GT |
---|---|---|
Sep 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2024 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Not Available |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Vega 7 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |