Key Differences
In short — Core i5-10600K outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-10600K is 2890 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 82% less energy than Intel Core i5-10600K - 17 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-10600K
- Performs up to 12% better in The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt than Core i3-3217U - 171 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 12 vs 4 threads
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
171
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.84/FPS
100%
Price, $
$143.7
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $143.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra+
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | Intel Core i5-10600K |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
4 | Threads | 12 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 95 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 41.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |