Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 9 7900 outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 9 7900 is 3879 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen 9 7900 - 17 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 9 7900
- Performs up to 42% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3217U - 136 vs 96 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 24 vs 4 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$368.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $368.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 213 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Jan 14th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 9 7900 |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 14th, 2023 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 9 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raphael |
Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket AM5 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.4 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 5 nm |
18.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon Graphics |
No | Overclockable | Yes |