Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 5 4600H outperforms Core i3-3217U on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 5 4600H is 2775 days newer than Core i3-3217U.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3217U
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than AMD Ryzen 5 4600H - 17 vs 45 Watts
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 5 4600H
- Performs up to 5% better in Forza Horizon 4 than Core i3-3217U - 310 vs 294 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3217U - 12 vs 4 threads
Forza Horizon 4
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Max
Core i3-3217U
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Ryzen 5 4600H
Mobile • Jan 6th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3217U | vs | AMD Ryzen 5 4600H |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 6th, 2020 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Renoir |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | AMD Socket FP6 |
Mobile | Segment | Mobile |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
| 1.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
17 W | TDP | 45 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
| 18.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | Radeon RX Vega 6 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
