Buy on Amazon
$70
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i7-8700T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3210 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i7-8700T is 1917 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Up to 77% cheaper than Core i7-8700T - $70.0 vs $298.95
- Up to 75% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-8700T - $0.55 vs $2.23 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-8700T
- Performs up to 5% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-3210 - 134 vs 128 FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3210 - 12 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel Core i3-3210 3.20GHz LGA 1155 Processor BX80637I33210
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6544 minutes ago
Intel CM8068403358413 Core i7-8700T Prcsr Tray
Buy for $298.95 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6545 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3210
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Core i7-8700T
Desktop • Apr 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i7-8700T |
|---|---|---|
| Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Apr 2nd, 2018 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 4 | Threads | 12 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| 55 W | TDP | 35 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
| Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
