Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-7100T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-7100T is 1463 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-7100T
- Performs up to 10% better in Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3210 - 109 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 26% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $51.6 vs $70.0
- Up to 34% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than Core i3-3210 - $0.47 vs $0.71 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15736 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
109
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.47/FPS
100%
Price, $
$51.6
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $51.6 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15737 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Core i3-7100T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 4 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |