Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930T outperforms the more expensive Core i3-3210 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930T is 1463 days newer than the more expensive Core i3-3210.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 4 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Performs up to 1% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-3210 - 375 vs 373 FPS
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $39.0 vs $70.0
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i3-3210 - 35 vs 55 Watts
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76675 minutes ago
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76675 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3210 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930T |
---|---|---|
Jan 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Ivy Bridge | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
4 | Threads | 2 |
3.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
55 W | TDP | 35 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
32.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
Intel HD 2500 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |