Buy on Amazon
$244.85
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $242
Availability
MSRP in USD: $242
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-13500 outperforms Core i3-3110M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-13500 is 3869 days newer than Core i3-3110M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3110M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-13500 - 35 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-13500
- Performs up to 57% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Core i3-3110M - 688 vs 437 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3110M - 20 vs 4 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
FPS
688
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$244.85
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Core i5-13500 Desktop Processor 14 cores (6 P-cores + 8 E-cores) 24MB Cache, up to 4.8 GHz
Buy for $244.85 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-3110M
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2012
Core i5-13500
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-3110M | vs | Intel Core i5-13500 |
|---|---|---|
| Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 14 |
| 4 | Threads | 20 |
| 2.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 24.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
| Intel HD 4000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 770 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Builds Using Core i3-3110M or Core i5-13500
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege, 1920 x 1080, Ultra
278 FPS
$3.24/FPS
GeForce RTX 3050 Mobile
Core i5-13500
16 GB, N/A Storage
Buy on Amazon
$899.99
In Stock
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
