Key Differences
In short — Core i3-13100F outperforms Core i3-2367M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-13100F is 4113 days newer than Core i3-2367M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2367M
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-13100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i3-13100F
- Performs up to 18% better in F1 22 than Core i3-2367M - 287 vs 244 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2367M - 8 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Core i3-2367M
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Core i3-13100F
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2023
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2367M | vs | Intel Core i3-13100F |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 4th, 2023 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Raptor Lake |
| Intel BGA 1023 | Socket | Intel Socket 1700 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 1.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.5 GHz |
| 17 W | TDP | Not Available |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 10 nm |
| 14.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
