Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3630 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 35 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 32% better in Dying Light 2: Stay Human than Core i3-2350M - 149 vs 113 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 16 vs 4 threads
Dying Light 2: Stay Human
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality Raytracing
Core i3-2350M
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 23.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
