Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9920X outperforms Core i3-2350M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-9920X is 2575 days newer than Core i3-2350M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2350M
- Consumes up to 79% less energy than Intel Core i9-9920X - 35 vs 165 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-9920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9920X
- Performs up to 22% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-2350M - 107 vs 88 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2350M - 24 vs 4 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
107
100%
Value, $/FPS
$5.49/FPS
100%
Price, $
$587.46
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $587.46 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13671 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Mobile • Oct 1st, 2011
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2350M | vs | Intel Core i9-9920X |
---|---|---|
Oct 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 12 |
4 | Threads | 24 |
2.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 165 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
23.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |