Key Differences
In short — Core i7-10700F outperforms Core i3-2330M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-10700F is 3256 days newer than Core i3-2330M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2330M
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i7-10700F - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-10700F doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-10700F
- Performs up to 12% better in F1 22 than Core i3-2330M - 279 vs 248 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2330M - 16 vs 4 threads
F1 22
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
279
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.81/FPS
100%
Price, $
$225.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $225.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3212 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Mobile • Jun 1st, 2011
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2330M | vs | Intel Core i7-10700F |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
2.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.8 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
22.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |