Buy on Amazon
$82.02
In Stock
Availability
Availability
No items available
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — FX-8150 outperforms Core i3-2310M on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-8150 is 253 days newer than Core i3-2310M.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2310M
- Consumes up to 72% less energy than AMD FX-8150 - 35 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8150 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8150
- Performs up to 1% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i3-2310M - 127 vs 126 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2310M - 8 vs 4 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
AMD FX-Series FX-8150 FX8150 Desktop CPU Socket AM3 938 FD8150FRW8KGU FD8150FRGUBOX 8MB
Buy for $82.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 65762 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Core i3-2310M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
FX-8150
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Core i3-2310M
Mobile • Feb 1st, 2011
Single-Core
330
75.68807339449542%
Multi-Core
661
38.119953863898495%
Intel Core i3-2310M | vs | AMD FX-8150 |
|---|---|---|
| Feb 1st, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
| Core i3 | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
| Intel Socket G2 (988B) | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 4 | Threads | 8 |
| 2.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
21.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.