Key Differences
In short — Core i9-9900T outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2125 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2125 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i9-9900T is 2788 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2125.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2125
- Up to 58% cheaper than Core i9-9900T - $152.0 vs $360.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Lost Ark than Core i9-9900T - $0.68 vs $1.4 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i9-9900T
- Performs up to 16% better in Lost Ark than Core i3-2125 - 258 vs 223 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i3-2125 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2125 - 16 vs 4 threads
Lost Ark
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Buy for $152 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13517 minutes ago
Buy for $360 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 13517 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Apr 23rd, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2125 | vs | Intel Core i9-9900T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 23rd, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 16 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 21.0x |
Intel HD 3000 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |