Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2950X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2120T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-2120T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2950X is 2553 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2120T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2120T
- Up to 94% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $60.0 vs $1075.0
- Up to 94% better value when playing Battlefield IV than Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - $0.16 vs $2.63 per FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X - 35 vs 180 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X
- Performs up to 11% better in Battlefield IV than Core i3-2120T - 408 vs 369 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2120T - 32 vs 4 threads
Battlefield IV
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $60 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6932 minutes ago
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
FPS
408
100%
Value, $/FPS
$2.63/FPS
6%
Price, $
$1075
5%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,075 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 6933 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Aug 31st, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-2120T | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2950X |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Aug 31st, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 16 |
4 | Threads | 32 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 180 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 35.0x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |