Key Differences
In short — FX-9590 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-2100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-9590 is 842 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-2100.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-2100
- Up to 84% cheaper than FX-9590 - $49.0 vs $298.02
- Consumes up to 70% less energy than AMD FX-9590 - 65 vs 220 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-9590 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-9590
- Performs up to 1% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Core i3-2100 - 169 vs 168 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-2100 - 8 vs 4 threads
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $49 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
Buy for $298.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 5 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Desktop • Jun 11th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Feb 20th, 2011
Single-Core
466
85.66176470588235%
Multi-Core
954
43.94288346384155%
Intel Core i3-2100 | vs | AMD FX-9590 |
---|---|---|
Feb 20th, 2011 | Release Date | Jun 11th, 2013 |
Core i3 | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
4 | Threads | 8 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.0 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 220 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 23.5x |
Intel HD 2000 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |