Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-14100F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-7700T on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-14100F is 2561 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-7700T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-14100F
- Performs up to 38% better in Starfield than Core i7-7700T - 76 vs 55 FPS
- Up to 33% cheaper than Core i7-7700T - $100.99 vs $150.0
- Up to 51% better value when playing Starfield than Core i7-7700T - $1.33 vs $2.73 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7700T
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-14100F doesn't have integrated graphics
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
FPS
76
100%
Value, $/FPS
$1.33/FPS
100%
Price, $
$100.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $100.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15285 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 15287 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2024
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-14100F | vs | Intel Core i7-7700T |
---|---|---|
Jan 8th, 2024 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Raptor Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 35 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
35.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |