Key Differences
In short — Core i3-12100F outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-12100F is 3796 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-12100F
- Performs up to 37% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G540 - 209 vs 153 FPS
- Consumes up to 11% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 58 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 80% cheaper than Core i3-12100F - $19.25 vs $94.98
- Up to 71% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i3-12100F - $0.13 vs $0.45 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-12100F doesn't have integrated graphics
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
FPS
209
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
28%
Price, $
$94.98
20%
FPS Winner
Buy for $94.98 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3863 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
153
73%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 3862 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 25th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-12100F | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 25th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.3 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
58 W | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
33.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |