Key Differences
In short — Core i9-10900KF outperforms Core i3-1125G4 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i9-10900KF is 125 days older than Core i3-1125G4.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1125G4
- Consumes up to 78% less energy than Intel Core i9-10900KF - 28 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-10900KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-10900KF
- Performs up to 2% better in Red Dead Redemption 2 than Core i3-1125G4 - 162 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-1125G4 - 20 vs 8 threads
Red Dead Redemption 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Mobile • Sep 2nd, 2020
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1125G4 | vs | Intel Core i9-10900KF |
---|---|---|
Sep 2nd, 2020 | Release Date | Apr 30th, 2020 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Tiger Lake | Codename | Comet Lake |
Intel BGA 1449 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Mobile | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 10 |
8 | Threads | 20 |
2.0 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
3.7 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.3 GHz |
28 W | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
20.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Iris Xe Graphics G4 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |