Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10320 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10320 is 1213 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10320
- Performs up to 11% better in Saints Row than Celeron G3930 - 164 vs 148 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 8 vs 2 threads
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 37% cheaper than Core i3-10320 - $88.0 vs $139.99
- Up to 31% better value when playing Saints Row than Core i3-10320 - $0.59 vs $0.85 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i3-10320 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Saints Row
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
164
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.85/FPS
69.41176470588235%
Price, $
$139.99
62%
FPS Winner
Buy for $139.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1830 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
148
90.2439024390244%
Value, $/FPS
$0.59/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1826 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
39.50617283950617%
Multi-Core
1043
22.546476437527023%
Intel Core i3-10320 | vs | Intel Celeron G3930 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jan 3rd, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Celeron |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 2 |
3.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.6 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 51 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
38.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 610 |
No | Overclockable | No |