Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX is 576 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 83% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $199.06 vs $1150.0
- Up to 82% better value when playing Apex Legends than Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - $0.71 vs $4.05 per FPS
- Consumes up to 74% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX - 65 vs 250 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX
- Performs up to 1% better in Apex Legends than Core i3-10300 - 284 vs 281 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 48 vs 8 threads
Apex Legends
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
281
98%
Value, $/FPS
$0.71/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 20 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
FPS
284
100%
Value, $/FPS
$4.05/FPS
17%
Price, $
$1150
17%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 21 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Oct 2nd, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper 2970WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Oct 2nd, 2018 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Comet Lake | Codename | Colfax |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3r2 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 24 |
8 | Threads | 48 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 250 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 12 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 30.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |