Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 7 3700X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10300 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10300 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 7 3700X is 298 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10300.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10300
- Up to 3% cheaper than Ryzen 7 3700X - $199.06 vs $205.0
- Up to 1% better value when playing Dirt 5 than Ryzen 7 3700X - $1.05 vs $1.06 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 7 3700X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 7 3700X
- Performs up to 2% better in Dirt 5 than Core i3-10300 - 193 vs 189 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10300 - 16 vs 8 threads
Dirt 5
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
189
97%
Value, $/FPS
$1.05/FPS
100%
Price, $
$199.06
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $199.06 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4877 minutes ago
Buy for $205 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4878 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Jul 7th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10300 | vs | AMD Ryzen 7 3700X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Jul 7th, 2019 |
Core i3 | Collection | Ryzen 7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 8 |
8 | Threads | 16 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.4 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |