Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10105F outperforms the more expensive Core i7-6700K on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10105F is 2054 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-6700K.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105F
- Up to 45% cheaper than Core i7-6700K - $98.18 vs $180.0
- Up to 45% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-6700K - $0.72 vs $1.32 per FPS
- Consumes up to 29% less energy than Intel Core i7-6700K - 65 vs 91 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i7-6700K
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i3-10105F doesn't have integrated graphics
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
136
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.72/FPS
100%
Price, $
$98.18
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $98.18 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 54 minutes ago
Buy for $180 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 55 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Aug 1st, 2015
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105F | vs | Intel Core i7-6700K |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Aug 1st, 2015 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i7 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 8 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 91 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 40.0x |
None | Integrated Graphics | HD Graphics 530 |
No | Overclockable | No |