Key Differences
In short — Core i5-7640X outperforms the cheaper Core i3-10105 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-10105 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-7640X is 1359 days older than the cheaper Core i3-10105.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10105
- Up to 76% cheaper than Core i5-7640X - $86.45 vs $356.7
- Up to 75% better value when playing A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i5-7640X - $0.65 vs $2.6 per FPS
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Core i5-7640X - 65 vs 112 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i5-7640X - 8 vs 4 threads
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-7640X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-7640X
- Performs up to 3% better in A Plague Tale: Requiem than Core i3-10105 - 137 vs 133 FPS
A Plague Tale: Requiem
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
133
97%
Value, $/FPS
$0.65/FPS
100%
Price, $
$86.45
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $86.45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1067 minutes ago
Buy for $356.7 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1062 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10105 | vs | Intel Core i5-7640X |
---|---|---|
Mar 16th, 2021 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i5 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Kaby Lake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 4 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
4.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 112 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
37.0x | Multiplier | 39.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |