Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Core i3-10100 outperforms the more expensive Core i9-7920X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Core i3-10100 is 963 days newer than the more expensive Core i9-7920X.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 0% better in Rocket League than Core i9-7920X - 717 vs 714 FPS
- Up to 69% cheaper than Core i9-7920X - $93.56 vs $299.0
- Up to 69% better value when playing Rocket League than Core i9-7920X - $0.13 vs $0.42 per FPS
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than Intel Core i9-7920X - 95 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i9-7920X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i9-7920X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-10100 - 24 vs 8 threads
Rocket League
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
717
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.13/FPS
100%
Price, $
$93.56
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $93.56 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
Buy for $299 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High Quality
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 10th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i9-7920X |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 10th, 2017 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i9 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Skylake |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 12 |
8 | Threads | 24 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.9 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
95 W | TDP | 140 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 29.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |