Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-4150 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-4150 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2191 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-4150.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 2% better in Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-4150 - 175 vs 171 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-4150 - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-4150
- Up to 52% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $45.0 vs $93.74
- Up to 52% better value when playing Assassin's Creed Valhalla than Core i3-10100 - $0.26 vs $0.54 per FPS
- Consumes up to 43% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 54 vs 95 Watts
Assassin's Creed Valhalla
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Buy for $93.74 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4839 minutes ago
Buy for $45 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 4839 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra High
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-4150 |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | May 1st, 2014 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.5 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 54 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4400 |
No | Overclockable | No |