Key Differences
In short — Core i3-10100 outperforms the cheaper Core i3-3220T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Core i3-3220T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-10100 is 2796 days newer than the cheaper Core i3-3220T.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-10100
- Performs up to 15% better in Battlefield V than Core i3-3220T - 239 vs 207 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Core i3-3220T - 8 vs 4 threads
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Up to 19% cheaper than Core i3-10100 - $59.4 vs $73.5
- Up to 6% better value when playing Battlefield V than Core i3-10100 - $0.29 vs $0.31 per FPS
- Consumes up to 63% less energy than Intel Core i3-10100 - 35 vs 95 Watts
Battlefield V
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
FPS
239
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.31/FPS
93.54838709677419%
Price, $
$73.5
80%
FPS Winner
Buy for $73.5 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 151 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
207
86.61087866108787%
Value, $/FPS
$0.29/FPS
100%
Price, $
$59.4
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 150 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 30th, 2020
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
458
32.117812061711085%
Multi-Core
941
22.325029655990512%
Intel Core i3-10100 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Apr 30th, 2020 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Core i3 | Collection | Core i3 |
Comet Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1200 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
4 | Cores | 2 |
8 | Threads | 4 |
3.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
4.3 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
95 W | TDP | 35 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
36.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
UHD Graphics 630 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |