Key Differences
In short — Core i3-1005G1 outperforms Xeon E5-2609 v2 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i3-1005G1 is 2160 days newer than Xeon E5-2609 v2.
Advantages of Intel Core i3-1005G1
- Performs up to 18% better in Minecraft than Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 694 vs 587 FPS
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 - 15 vs 80 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 doesn't have integrated graphics
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Core i3-1005G1
Mobile • Aug 1st, 2019
Xeon E5-2609 v2
Server/Workstation • Sep 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Core i3-1005G1 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2609 v2 |
|---|---|---|
Aug 1st, 2019 | Release Date | Sep 1st, 2013 |
| Core i3 | Collection | Xeon E5 |
| Ice Lake | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
| Intel BGA 1526 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Mobile | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 4 | Threads | 4 |
| 1.2 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
3.4 GHz | Turbo Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
15 W | TDP | 80 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
| 12.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
UHD Graphics | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
