Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive Core i7-3960X on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3704 days newer than the more expensive Core i7-3960X.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 6% better in The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3960X - 137 vs 129 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than Core i7-3960X - $49.99 vs $350.0
- Up to 87% better value when playing The Last of Us Part I than Core i7-3960X - $0.36 vs $2.71 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-3960X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-3960X
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
The Last of Us Part I
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
137
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.36/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 83 minutes ago
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
FPS
129
94.16058394160584%
Value, $/FPS
$2.71/FPS
13.284132841328415%
Price, $
$350
14%
Buy for $350 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 84 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Nov 14th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i7-3960X |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Nov 14th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge E |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.9 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 130 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 33.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |