Key Differences
In short — Core i5-11500 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G6900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G6900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-11500 is 294 days older than the cheaper Celeron G6900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Up to 67% cheaper than Core i5-11500 - $49.99 vs $150.0
- Up to 66% better value when playing Battlefield 2042 than Core i5-11500 - $0.3 vs $0.87 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i5-11500
- Performs up to 4% better in Battlefield 2042 than Celeron G6900 - 173 vs 166 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 12 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 2042
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
166
95.95375722543352%
Value, $/FPS
$0.3/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
FPS
173
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.87/FPS
34.48275862068965%
Price, $
$150
33%
FPS Winner
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 178 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Mar 16th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Single-Core
1603
80.31062124248497%
Multi-Core
2696
36.314655172413794%
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | Intel Core i5-11500 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Mar 16th, 2021 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Alder Lake | Codename | Rocket Lake |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 65 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics 750 |
No | Overclockable | No |