Buy on Amazon
$49.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2681 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 18% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - 179 vs 152 FPS
- Up to 80% cheaper than FX-8370 - $49.99 vs $248.02
- Up to 83% better value when playing Total War: WARHAMMER III than FX-8370 - $0.28 vs $1.63 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
179
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.28/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Intel Celeron G6900 Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) UHD Graphics 710 Alder Lake (OEM Tray Version) 46W - Reliable Performance for Home and Office
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 113 minutes ago
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
FPS
152
84.91620111731844%
Value, $/FPS
$1.63/FPS
17.17791411042945%
Price, $
$248.02
20%
AMD FD8370FRHKHBX 4 GHz FX-8370 Octa-Core Desktop Processor with Wraith Cooler, Black Edition
Buy for $248.02 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 114 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FX-8370
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 8 |
| 3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
