Key Differences
In short, we have a clear winner — Celeron G6900 outperforms the more expensive FX-8370 on the selected game parameters, and is also a better bang for your buck! The better performing Celeron G6900 is 2681 days newer than the more expensive FX-8370.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 17% better in Alan Wake 2 than FX-8370 - 116 vs 99 FPS
- Up to 86% cheaper than FX-8370 - $39.99 vs $276.99
- Up to 88% better value when playing Alan Wake 2 than FX-8370 - $0.34 vs $2.8 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-8370 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-8370
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 8 vs 2 threads
Alan Wake 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
116
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.34/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 17 minutes ago
Buy for $276.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 10 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Sep 2nd, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-8370 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Sep 2nd, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.0 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |