Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms FX-4350 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 3172 days newer than FX-4350.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 7% better in Valheim than FX-4350 - 204 vs 190 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Valheim
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
204
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
100%
Price, $
$49.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
Buy for $49.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 47 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Highest
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Alder Lake | Codename | Vishera |
Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
Not Available | TDP | 125 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |