Buy on Amazon
$39.99
In Stock
AvailabilityMSRP in USD: $52
Availability
MSRP in USD: $52
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — Celeron G6900 outperforms EPYC 7551P on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G6900 is 1650 days newer than EPYC 7551P.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G6900
- Performs up to 33% better in Counter-Strike 2 than EPYC 7551P - 391 vs 294 FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD EPYC 7551P doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD EPYC 7551P
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G6900 - 64 vs 2 threads
Counter-Strike 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
FPS
391
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.1/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.99
100%
FPS and Value Winner
CUK Intel Celeron G6900 Alder Lake Two Core Desktop Processor (Up to 3.4GHz) 46W Intel UHD Graphics 710 (OEM Tray Version)
Buy for $39.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 58099 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Very High
Celeron G6900
Desktop • Jan 4th, 2022
EPYC 7551P
Server/Workstation • Jun 29th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G6900 | vs | AMD EPYC 7551P |
|---|---|---|
Jan 4th, 2022 | Release Date | Jun 29th, 2017 |
| Celeron | Collection | EPYC |
| Alder Lake | Codename | Naples |
| Intel Socket 1700 | Socket | AMD Socket SP3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 32 |
| 2 | Threads | 64 |
3.4 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.0 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.0 GHz |
| Not Available | TDP | 180 W |
10 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
34.0x | Multiplier | 20.0x |
UHD Graphics 710 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.