Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms the cheaper Celeron G550 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G550 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2884 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G550.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G550
- Up to 87% cheaper than Ryzen 3 3300X - $19.59 vs $150.0
- Up to 85% better value when playing Ready or Not than Ryzen 3 3300X - $0.08 vs $0.55 per FPS
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 19% better in Ready or Not than Celeron G550 - 274 vs 231 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G550 - 8 vs 2 threads
Ready or Not
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
FPS
231
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.08/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.59
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 24 minutes ago
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 30 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Epic
Desktop • Jun 1st, 2012
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G550 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
Jun 1st, 2012 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.6 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 65 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
26.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |