Key Differences
In short — Xeon E5-2620 v3 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E5-2620 v3 is 1100 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 24% less energy than Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 - 65 vs 85 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3
- Performs up to 9% better in Minecraft than Celeron G540 - 649 vs 595 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 12 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
595
91%
Value, $/FPS
$0.03/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 12015 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2014
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Xeon E5-2620 v3 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2014 |
Celeron | Collection | Xeon E5 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Haswell-E |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 2011-3 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 12 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 85 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 24.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |