Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3220T outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3220T is 365 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 68% cheaper than Core i3-3220T - $19.25 vs $59.4
- Up to 67% better value when playing Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Core i3-3220T - $0.09 vs $0.27 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3220T
- Performs up to 0% better in Tom Clancy’s The Division 2 than Celeron G540 - 223 vs 222 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy’s The Division 2
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
222
99.55156950672645%
Value, $/FPS
$0.09/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 176 minutes ago
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
FPS
223
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.27/FPS
33.33333333333333%
Price, $
$59.4
32%
FPS Winner
Buy for $59.4 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 177 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Sep 3rd, 2012
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-3220T |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Sep 3rd, 2012 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 35 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 28.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |