Key Differences
In short — Core i3-3210 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G540 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i3-3210 is 485 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 72% cheaper than Core i3-3210 - $19.25 vs $70.0
- Up to 71% better value when playing Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Core i3-3210 - $0.22 vs $0.77 per FPS
Advantages of Intel Core i3-3210
- Performs up to 2% better in Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020 than Celeron G540 - 91 vs 89 FPS
- Consumes up to 15% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 55 vs 65 Watts
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Microsoft Flight Simulator 2020
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
89
97.8021978021978%
Value, $/FPS
$0.22/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 49 minutes ago
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
FPS
91
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.77/FPS
28.57142857142857%
Price, $
$70
27%
FPS Winner
Buy for $70 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Jan 1st, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | Intel Core i3-3210 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Jan 1st, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i3 |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Ivy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
65 W | TDP | 55 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 2500 |
No | Overclockable | No |