Key Differences
In short — Celeron G540 outperforms the more expensive FX-6100 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G540 is 38 days older than the more expensive FX-6100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 35% cheaper than FX-6100 - $19.25 vs $29.65
- Consumes up to 32% less energy than AMD FX-6100 - 65 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-6100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-6100
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 6 vs 2 threads
Control
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76831 minutes ago
Buy for $29.65 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76832 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-6100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Sandy Bridge | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.3 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 95 W |
32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 16.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |