Buy on Amazon
$19.25
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
No items available
Key Differences
In short — FX-4350 outperforms Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing FX-4350 is 603 days newer than Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Consumes up to 48% less energy than AMD FX-4350 - 65 vs 125 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4350 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4350
- Performs up to 2% better in Starfield than Celeron G540 - 44 vs 43 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G540 - 4 vs 2 threads
Starfield
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FPS
43
97.72727272727273%
Value, $/FPS
$0.45/FPS
100%
Price, $
$19.25
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G540 CPU Used 2-Core 2-Thread Desktop Processor 2.5 GHz 2M 65W LGA1155
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 193 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
FX-4350
Desktop • Apr 29th, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G540
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Single-Core
396
84.43496801705757%
Multi-Core
679
55.838815789473685%
Intel Celeron G540 | vs | AMD FX-4350 |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 4th, 2011 | Release Date | Apr 29th, 2013 |
| Celeron | Collection | FX |
| Sandy Bridge | Codename | Vishera |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 4 |
| 2 | Threads | 4 |
| 2.5 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
65 W | TDP | 125 W |
| 32 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
25.0x | Multiplier | 19.5x |
Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | No |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
