Key Differences
In short — Core i5-4670K outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G4900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-4670K is 1766 days older than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 44% cheaper than Core i5-4670K - $29.29 vs $52.0
- Up to 40% better value when playing Escape From Tarkov than Core i5-4670K - $0.15 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 36% less energy than Intel Core i5-4670K - 54 vs 84 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-4670K
- Performs up to 7% better in Escape From Tarkov than Celeron G4900 - 205 vs 192 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Escape From Tarkov
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
FPS
192
93%
Value, $/FPS
$0.15/FPS
100%
Price, $
$29.29
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $29.29 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 78 minutes ago
Buy for $52 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 79 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jun 2nd, 2013
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | Intel Core i5-4670K |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jun 2nd, 2013 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Haswell |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1150 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.4 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 84 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 22 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 34.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD 4600 |
No | Overclockable | Yes |