Key Differences
In short — Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX outperforms the cheaper Celeron G4900 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX is 833 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G4900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G4900
- Up to 96% cheaper than Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - $53.55 vs $1499.0
- Consumes up to 81% less energy than AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX - 54 vs 280 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX
- Performs up to 26% better in Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege than Celeron G4900 - 582 vs 463 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G4900 - 128 vs 2 threads
Tom Clancy's Rainbow Six Siege
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $53.55 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76697 minutes ago
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
FPS
582
100%
Value, $/FPS
Price, $
$1499
3%
FPS Winner
Buy for $1,499 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 76698 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Desktop • Jul 14th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Apr 3rd, 2018
Single-Core
616
38.54818523153942%
Multi-Core
1051
7.087941731858646%
Intel Celeron G4900 | vs | AMD Ryzen Threadripper PRO 3995WX |
---|---|---|
Apr 3rd, 2018 | Release Date | Jul 14th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen Threadripper |
Coffee Lake | Codename | Castle Peak |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket WRX8 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 64 |
2 | Threads | 128 |
3.1 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.7 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.2 GHz |
54 W | TDP | 280 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
31.0x | Multiplier | 27.0x |
UHD Graphics 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |