Key Differences
In short — Core i5-8600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930T on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930T is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-8600 is 407 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930T.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930T
- Up to 63% cheaper than Core i5-8600 - $39.0 vs $105.0
- Up to 60% better value when playing Battlefield 1 than Core i5-8600 - $0.17 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-8600 - 35 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-8600 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-8600
- Performs up to 6% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G3930T - 243 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930T - 6 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
230
94.65020576131687%
Value, $/FPS
$0.17/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $39 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1613 minutes ago
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
FPS
243
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.43/FPS
39.53488372093024%
Price, $
$105
37%
FPS Winner
Buy for $105 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 1614 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Feb 14th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
548
37.637362637362635%
Multi-Core
948
18.85816590411776%
Intel Celeron G3930T | vs | Intel Core i5-8600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Feb 14th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
35 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
27.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | No |