Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3930 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3930 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600 is 654 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3930.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Up to 30% cheaper than Core i5-9600 - $88.0 vs $125.0
- Up to 19% better value when playing World of Warcraft than Core i5-9600 - $0.55 vs $0.68 per FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600
- Performs up to 16% better in World of Warcraft than Celeron G3930 - 185 vs 159 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3930 - 6 vs 2 threads
World of Warcraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
FPS
159
85.94594594594595%
Value, $/FPS
$0.55/FPS
100%
Price, $
$88
100%
Value Winner
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 35 minutes ago
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
FPS
185
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.68/FPS
80.88235294117648%
Price, $
$125
70%
FPS Winner
Buy for $125 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 36 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Maximum
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Oct 19th, 2018
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Single-Core
608
41.58686730506156%
Multi-Core
1043
21.096278317152102%
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Oct 19th, 2018 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 6 |
2 | Threads | 6 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.1 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 31.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | UHD 630 |
No | Overclockable | No |