Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3930 outperforms the cheaper Celeron G540 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Celeron G3930 is 1948 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G540.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3930
- Performs up to 2% better in Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0 than Celeron G540 - 171 vs 167 FPS
- Consumes up to 22% less energy than Intel Celeron G540 - 51 vs 65 Watts
Advantages of Intel Celeron G540
- Up to 78% cheaper than Celeron G3930 - $19.25 vs $88.0
Call of Duty: Warzone 2.0
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Buy for $88 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
Buy for $19.25 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 104 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Extreme
Desktop • Jan 3rd, 2017
Desktop • Sep 4th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3930 | vs | Intel Celeron G540 |
---|---|---|
Jan 3rd, 2017 | Release Date | Sep 4th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | Celeron |
Kaby Lake | Codename | Sandy Bridge |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1155 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 2 |
2 | Threads | 2 |
2.9 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 2.5 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | Non-Turbo |
51 W | TDP | 65 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
29.0x | Multiplier | 25.0x |
Intel HD 610 | Integrated Graphics | Intel HD (Sandy Bridge) |
No | Overclockable | No |