Buy on Amazon
$39.9
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G3900 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing Celeron G3900 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 1225 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G3900.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Up to 78% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $39.9 vs $180.12
- Up to 76% better value when playing Minecraft than Core i5-9600KF - $0.06 vs $0.25 per FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 19% better in Minecraft than Celeron G3900 - 729 vs 614 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 6 vs 2 threads
Minecraft
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
FPS
614
84%
Value, $/FPS
$0.06/FPS
100%
Price, $
$39.9
100%
Value Winner
Intel Celeron G3900 2.8GHz Dual-Core Processor SR2HV LGA 1151 (CM8066201928610)
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2366 minutes ago
Core i5-9600KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
FPS
729
100%
Value, $/FPS
$0.25/FPS
24%
Price, $
$180.12
22%
FPS Winner
Intel Core i5-9600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $180.12 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 2366 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G3900
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Core i5-9600KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Skylake | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 14 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 28.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
