Key Differences
In short — Celeron G3900 outperforms the cheaper FX-4100 on the selected game parameters. However, the worse performing FX-4100 is a better bang for your buck. The better performing Celeron G3900 is 1420 days newer than the cheaper FX-4100.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G3900
- Performs up to 2% better in Sons Of The Forest than FX-4100 - 92 vs 90 FPS
- Consumes up to 46% less energy than AMD FX-4100 - 51 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD FX-4100 doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD FX-4100
- Up to 60% cheaper than Celeron G3900 - $16.0 vs $39.9
- Up to 58% better value when playing Sons Of The Forest than Celeron G3900 - $0.18 vs $0.43 per FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G3900 - 4 vs 2 threads
Sons Of The Forest
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $39.9 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
Buy for $16 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 165 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • Sep 1st, 2015
Desktop • Oct 12th, 2011
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Intel Celeron G3900 | vs | AMD FX-4100 |
---|---|---|
Sep 1st, 2015 | Release Date | Oct 12th, 2011 |
Celeron | Collection | FX |
Skylake | Codename | Zambezi |
Intel Socket 1151 | Socket | AMD Socket AM3+ |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 4 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
51 W | TDP | 95 W |
14 nm | Process Size | 32 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 18.0x |
Intel HD 510 | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |