Key Differences
In short — Core i7-7820X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i7-7820X is 1152 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 62% less energy than Intel Core i7-7820X - 53 vs 140 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i7-7820X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i7-7820X
- Performs up to 15% better in Total War: WARHAMMER III than Celeron G1840 - 175 vs 152 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 16 vs 2 threads
Total War: WARHAMMER III
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $449 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 75684 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Jun 26th, 2017
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
35.79021970233877%
Multi-Core
854
10.880366925723022%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | Intel Core i7-7820X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Jun 26th, 2017 |
Celeron | Collection | Core i7 |
Haswell | Codename | Skylake-E/EP |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 2066 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 8 |
2 | Threads | 16 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.6 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 140 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 36.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |