Key Differences
In short — Ryzen 3 3300X outperforms Celeron G1840 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Ryzen 3 3300X is 2185 days newer than Celeron G1840.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1840
- Consumes up to 18% less energy than AMD Ryzen 3 3300X - 53 vs 65 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while AMD Ryzen 3 3300X doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of AMD Ryzen 3 3300X
- Performs up to 7% better in Battlefield 1 than Celeron G1840 - 246 vs 230 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1840 - 8 vs 2 threads
Battlefield 1
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Buy for $140.99 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 207 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Desktop • Apr 24th, 2020
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Desktop • May 1st, 2014
Single-Core
505
30.239520958083833%
Multi-Core
854
14.741929915415156%
Intel Celeron G1840 | vs | AMD Ryzen 3 3300X |
---|---|---|
May 1st, 2014 | Release Date | Apr 24th, 2020 |
Celeron | Collection | Ryzen 3 |
Haswell | Codename | Matisse |
Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | AMD Socket AM4 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
2 | Cores | 4 |
2 | Threads | 8 |
2.8 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.8 GHz |
Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.3 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 65 W |
22 nm | Process Size | 7 nm |
28.0x | Multiplier | 38.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
No | Overclockable | Yes |