Buy on Amazon
$39.59
In Stock
Availability
Availability
Availability
Availability
Key Differences
In short — Core i5-9600KF outperforms the cheaper Celeron G1820 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Core i5-9600KF is 1864 days newer than the cheaper Celeron G1820.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1820
- Up to 74% cheaper than Core i5-9600KF - $39.59 vs $150.0
- Consumes up to 44% less energy than Intel Core i5-9600KF - 53 vs 95 Watts
- Works without a dedicated GPU, while Intel Core i5-9600KF doesn't have integrated graphics
Advantages of Intel Core i5-9600KF
- Performs up to 38% better in Far Cry 6 than Celeron G1820 - 127 vs 92 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1820 - 6 vs 2 threads
Far Cry 6
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Intel CPU BX80646G1820 Celeron G1820 2.70GHz 2M LGA1150 2C/2T Haswell
Buy for $39.59 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 50 minutes ago
Intel Core i5-9600KF Desktop Processor 6 Cores up to 4.6 GHz Turbo Unlocked Without Processor Graphics LGA1151 300 Series 95W
Buy for $150 on Amazon
In Stock
Updated 51 minutes ago
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
Ultra
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Core i5-9600KF
Desktop • Jan 8th, 2019
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1820
Desktop • Dec 1st, 2013
Single-Core
491
30.93887838689351%
Multi-Core
825
14.45593131242334%
Intel Celeron G1820 | vs | Intel Core i5-9600KF |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 1st, 2013 | Release Date | Jan 8th, 2019 |
| Celeron | Collection | Core i5 |
| Haswell | Codename | Coffee Lake |
| Intel Socket 1150 | Socket | Intel Socket 1151 |
Desktop | Segment | Desktop |
| 2 | Cores | 6 |
| 2 | Threads | 6 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.7 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 4.6 GHz |
53 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 37.0x |
Intel HD (Haswell) | Integrated Graphics | None |
| No | Overclockable | Yes |
Similar CPU Comparisons
Select from the most popular similar processor comparisons. Most compared processor combinations, including the currently selected ones, are at the top.
