Key Differences
In short — Xeon E-2388G outperforms Celeron G1620 on the selected game parameters. We do not have the prices of both CPUs to compare value. The better performing Xeon E-2388G is 3201 days newer than Celeron G1620.
Advantages of Intel Celeron G1620
- Consumes up to 42% less energy than Intel Xeon E-2388G - 55 vs 95 Watts
Advantages of Intel Xeon E-2388G
- Performs up to 7% better in Stray than Celeron G1620 - 188 vs 176 FPS
- Can execute more multi-threaded tasks simultaneously than Intel Celeron G1620 - 16 vs 2 threads
Stray
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
TOP 5 Games
Resolution
1920 x 1080
Game Graphics
High
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Xeon E-2388G
Server/Workstation • Sep 8th, 2021
Geekbench 5 Benchmarks
Celeron G1620
Desktop • Dec 3rd, 2012
Single-Core
409
17.79808529155788%
Multi-Core
723
7.235064545181627%
Intel Celeron G1620 | vs | Intel Xeon E-2388G |
|---|---|---|
| Dec 3rd, 2012 | Release Date | Sep 8th, 2021 |
| Celeron | Collection | Xeon E |
| Ivy Bridge | Codename | Rocket Lake |
| Intel Socket 1155 | Socket | Intel Socket 1200 |
Desktop | Segment | Server |
| 2 | Cores | 8 |
| 2 | Threads | 16 |
| 2.7 GHz | Base Clock Speed | 3.2 GHz |
| Non-Turbo | Turbo Clock Speed | 5.1 GHz |
55 W | TDP | 95 W |
| 22 nm | Process Size | 14 nm |
| 27.0x | Multiplier | 32.0x |
| Intel HD | Integrated Graphics | UHD Graphics P750 |
| No | Overclockable | No |
